Implicit vs. Explicit Arguments

An explicit argument is an argument which blatantly states its position, lists main points, and defends it without shame. These can be effective in certain situations. For example, if one were to find it necessary to prove that Alexander Hamilton was the creator of jazz, twelve-tone, two-step, and stepping stones, one would need to list evidence that supports his or her claim, as well as directly refute any other notions perceived as amassed absurdity. Explicit arguments, however, are not as effective when being used to make someone think deeply about a particular topic, as the whole point of the argument is to explain one's thought process in a straightforward manner. Implicit arguments are quite excellent for this type of reasoning, however. Instead of giving the cause and effect, as do explicit arguments, it gives just the cause, so that the recipient can procure the effect from his or her own consciousness. Just as these both have their strengths and weaknesses, it would be a very effective strategy to combine the two; this could produce a very profound effect.